Who Tampered With the Bible Scriptures?


The Bible was written thousands of years ago 
by the prophets designated by Jehovah, the 
God who created us and the entire universe. 
Through the ages, many people copied the 
scriptures carefully and accurately because they 
knew that the words written were from Jehovah 
God Almighty Himself.  

Is it possible that in recent years some people may have 
actually altered the written words so as to change the 
meaning drastically? Are there scriptures in the Bible 
now that were added without Jehovah’s consent? 

Who are these people who dared to alter the Bible and 
why did they dare to make unauthorized changes? 

Despite the Bible’s warnings not to add to, nor take 
away from the words of the Holy Scriptures
, some 
translators and copyists have altered and changed the 
wording of various scriptures in order to support false 
beliefs such as the Trinity Dogma.   

Was that a good idea? 

18 For I testify unto every man that heareth the words of the 
prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things
God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: 
19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book 
of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of 
life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written 
in this book.” 
(Revelation 22:18-19) (King James Version) 

While some verses were added that were not part of the 
original text, God’s name, Jehovah, was removed to obscure 
the distinction between God and His son – such as: 

“44 The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my 
right hand, till I make thine enemies thy footstool?” 
(Matthew 22:44) (KJV) 

Which lord is which? 

The answer is obvious when the scripture 
has not been tampered with: 

Jehovah said to my Lord: ‘Sit at my right hand until 
I put your enemies beneath your feet?’”
(Matthew 22:44) (New World Translation) 

What do Bible Scholars say about mistranslation of the Bible? 

What I discovered in most of the versions of the Bible produced 
by trinitarians which I studied
 – is irrefutable proof of intentional
 of words which refer to the spirit of God.
statement is not intended as an antagonistic denunciation of those 
translators. It is simply a statement of fact, and it is a fact that no 
scholar on earth can refute.
 In the versions of the holy scriptures 
which they produce, I learned that Christian trinitarians routinely 
and purposely
 mistranslate Greek pronouns, so as to promote 
the doctrine of the holy Trinity.” 

”Every time a trinitarian finger is pointed to a verse or to a word 
which might, by a great stretch of imagination, be interpreted 
as endorsing the doctrine of a “holy Trinity”, it only serves to show 
how devoted to his faith a trinitarian can become.”
The Influence of Trinitarian Doctrine on Translations of the Bible
   by John David Clark, Sr 

From: http://www.isaiah58.com/TRINITY.HTM 

“It’s interesting to see that many of the scriptural “evidences” 
said to be in favor of the doctrine of the Trinity, are grounded
in mistranslation, errors in textual transmission, and sometimes 
even outright forgery
. These can often be exposed by even a 
cursory glance at an English/Greek interlinear Bible or a Greek 

“After all, if the Bible already clearly taught that God existed as 
‘three co-equal and co-eternal persons,’ it should hardly seem 
necessary to tamper with the text. The truth is, it’s unlikely the 
idea of a triune God could have ever been derived from the pages 
of scripture as originally given by God, for it seems to have been 
unknown to the writers of God’s Word, and to the first century 
-The Trinity- A Doctrine Overdue for Extinction; Part 2
”Imperfections in the King James Version”
by Ted Whitten 


Was, for example, 1John 5:7-8 altered? 

1 John 5 
7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, 
the Word, and the Holy Ghost
: and these three are one. 
(1John 5:7) (KJV) 

The NIV translation of the Bible says that it is so: 

1 John 5 
This is the one who came by water and blood—Jesus Christ. 
He did not come by water only, but by water and blood. And 
it is the Spirit who testifies, because the Spirit is the truth. 
For there are three that testify: the Spirit, the water and 
the blood
; and the three are in agreement.  


5:7,8 Late manuscripts of the Vulgate testify in heaven: the Father, 
the Word and the Holy Spirit, and these three are one. 8 And there 
are three that testify on earth: the (not found in any Greek 
manuscript before the sixteenth century


So – where did this alteration come from? 

1 John 5:7     “This verse has no basis in the 
Greek text.   Under Roman Catholic pressure, 
Erasmus inserted them…
They are not a part 
of the inspired Bible
(Word Meanings in the NT ,  Ralph Earle. P. 452). 

What about Matthew 28:19? 

19 Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the 
name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. 
(Matthew 28:19) 

“When did the corruption of the baptismal formula arise?  
According to Canney’s Encyclopedia of Religion, the early 
church baptized in the name of Jesus
 until the second century.  
Encyclopaedia Brittanica (11th ed., Vol 3, p365) agrees, stating 
that baptism was changed from the name of Jesus to the words 
Father, Son, and Holy Ghost
 in the 2nd century.  And in Volume 
2 of the Encyclopaedia of Religion and Ethics, p.389, it notes that 
baptism was always performed in the name of Jesus until the time 
of Justin Martyr.” 

From: http://members.aol.com/BRIHOECK7/Lie.html 

Who rewrote the Bible to support the Trinity Doctrine? 

”Learned men, so called Correctores were, following the church 
meeting at Nicea 325 AD
, selected by the church authorities to 
scrutinize thesacred texts and rewrite them in order to correct 
their meaning in accordance with the views which the church 
had just sanctioned.”
-Einfhrung in die Textkritik des griechischen 
 Testaments: Eberhard Nestle 

Despite the fact that God’s Son repeatedly confirmed many 
times that his Father was distinct and superior to himself, 
the newly formed doctrine of the Nicea Council completely 
ignored his teachings. 

The trinity doctrine says they are equal, but – 

Christ said that his Father was greater than he was… 

28 You have already heard me say that I am going and that I will 
also come back to you. If you really love me, you should be glad 
that I am going back to the Father, because he is greater than I am. 
(John 14:28) (Contemporary English Version)

…he said that there were some things he didn’t know… 

36 ”However, no one knows the day or the hour when these things 
will happen, not even the angels in heaven or the Son himself. 
Only the Father knows. 
(Matthew 24:36) (New Living Translation) 

…and some authority that belonged to his Father was not his… 

20 Then the mother of Zebedee’s sons came to Jesus with her sons 
and, kneeling down, asked a favor of him. 21 ”What is it you want?” 
he asked. She said, “Grant that one of these two sons of mine may 
sit at your right and the other at your left in your kingdom.” 
22 ”You don’t know what you are asking,” Jesus said to them. “Can 
you drink the cup I am going to drink?” “We can,” they answered. 
23 Jesus said to them, “You will indeed drink from my cup, but to sit 
at my right or left is not for me to grant. These places belong to 
those for whom they have been prepared by my Father.” 

(Matthew 20:20-23) (New International Version)

…yet Trinitarians ignore these and many other 
scriptures where Christ denied equality with God.

They had to do this to make the trinity doctrine work. 

Over the years, various Scholars have researched the 
question – “why are there contradictory statements 
in the Bible”? 
Why would Christ say he was not God 
in many scriptures and then declare he is God in a 
few others? 

The experts have come up with findings that religious 
pressure to support the Trinity Dogma caused some 
copyists and translators to falsely insert and alter 
certain scriptures in order to support the pagan trinity 
formula that ancient Rome forced upon all of her subjects. 

Was everybody fooled? 

“Who but a thoroughly deluded man would be so bold as, to 
intentionally mistranslate for his own doctrinal purposes, the 
words of the apostles of Jesus
? Who but a thoroughly deluded 
man could have so little fear of the righteous judgment of God 
that he would publish a translation of the Greek that he himself 
knows is unfaithful to the original words, as almost all the translators
in this study have done? Jesus said that the time would come when 
his followers would be murdered by those who think that they are 
doing a service to God (John 16:2).” 

“And if throughout Christianity’s sordid history its leaders have 
felt constrained by their faith to execute people, for the simple “crime” 
of refusing to receive some of its teachings, why should it be surprising 
to learn that Christianity’s scholars feel free to alter, without comment, 
some of the words of the Greek text in order to promote their trinitarian 
The Influence of Trinitarian Doctrine  on Translations of the Bible 
   by John David Clark, Sr 

From: http://www.isaiah58.com/TRINITY.HTM 

So today, many still believe the pagan trinity lie – and equate 
it with true Christianity, while those who reject it as spurious 
are labeled as a cult.  They have thus pronounced good as 
being bad – and evil as being good!  


20 Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who 
put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter 
for sweet and sweet for bitter. (Isaiah 5:20) (NIV)  

What else was altered in the Bible?  

God’s name was removed and a senseless trinity lord 
was added.  

Was that enough? What else do the experts know?   

The realization that Christ’s name was never “Jesus” 
but rather “Jehoshua”, may be startling to learn.   
The Messiah has been called “Jesus” ever since the
Romans took over Christianity as a state religion.
That’s a long time.  So much has been said and done
in the name of “Jesus” for the last dozen centuries 
that to call God’s son by a different name will appear 
to be sacrilege in the eyes of many.  
But that doesn’t change the fact that “Jesus” 
was his name.  
“Ieous” was Greek for “Hail Zeus”, which was translated 
later into English as “Jesus”. And this error has continued 
to the present. 
–Personal Names in the Bible
by Dr. W.F. Wilkinson, M.A.
Joint Editor of Webster and Wilkinson’s
Greek Testament: pages 342-343.   
“Since Zeus was the top god of their experience, 
attaching the name Ioesus (hail Zeus) to 
Yahshua (Yehoshua) – gave Him top priority 
in the worship hierarchy.”
-Winds of Praise Broadcasting
Believer or Follower?
The Sound of the Shofar
By Jon Thompson  
“Jehoshua was the name given to Christ by his  
heavenly Father, Jehovah God.   Many years 
after his death – Rome changed his name to 
suit their pagan heritage and to please their
pagan converts. 


The name Joshua (Jehoshua) derives its greatest
importance and highest sanctity from the fact
that it was sacredly chosen as the name to be 
borne by the Messiah.  


This name was later corrupted and altered 
into the name Jesus.” 
–Personal Names in the Bible
by Dr. W.F. Wilkinson, M.A.
Joint Editor of Webster and Wilkinson’s
Greek Testament: pages 342-343. 

So, Jesus is a man-made Greek god! 

Who else does not belong in the Bible? 


According to the online Encyclopedia Wikipedia: 

Amun (also spelled Amon, Amoun, Amen, and 
rarely Imen) Greek Ἄμμων Ammon, and Ἅμμων 
Hammon, reconstructed EgyptianYamānu) was 
the name of a deity, in Egyptian mythology, who 
gradually rose to become one of the most 
important deities in Ancient Egypt, before fading 
into obscurity. 
From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amun 

In this, the last days – all of these false doctrines, which came 
from pagan Rome, would be exposed. 


4 But you, Daniel, shut up the words and seal the book, 
until the time of the end. Many shall run to and fro, and 
knowledge shall increase
(Daniel 12:4) (English Standard Version)  

7 Surely the Sovereign LORD does nothing without 
revealing his plan to his servants the prophets.
(Amos 3:7) (New International Version)  


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: